🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are increasingly enabling the far right to set the public discourse, as per a new research conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics discovered that this trend has inadvertently helped far-right parties by validating their ideas and spreading them more widely.

Analysis Based on Two Decades of Media Coverage

The results, released in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an automated text analysis of over 520,000 articles from a half-dozen national newspapers.

Capital-based researchers observed that as the far right shifted from marginal topics in the late 1990s to central themes like integration and migration, established parties progressively adapted their messaging in reaction.

This adjustment boosted the spread of these ideas and indicated to the electorate that such positions were acceptable.

Implications for Democracy

"Political communication by established parties is crucial in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a expert in political behavior participating in the study.

"This element has been overlooked," she added.

The impact was evident even when mainstream parties were criticising the far right. "They still receive focus," the researcher commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is crucial."

Mainstreaming Phenomenon Throughout Europe

While the research was centered around the German context, this normalisation effect is likely to affect nations throughout the European continent.

"You see this a lot in European media," explained another co-author. "Radical groups says something and everybody starts talking about it for one week."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he added.

Hardening of Political Discourse

At certain points, political figures have also toughened their language to match that of the far right.

In a recent interview, a then German chancellor advocated widespread expulsions and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Comparable examples can be observed throughout the continent, as politicians from countries ranging from the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the rhetoric of the far right, particularly on immigration.

This has created an feedback loop that was inconceivable a ten years prior.

Central Issue: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are discussing societal topics – immigration, integration – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the far right, that's the whole idea of agenda setting," clarified a study author.

Some parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the hardline agenda of the far right, despite studies indicates that doing so leads the electorate to cast their ballot for the far right.

Gradual Influence and Voter Awareness

The scope of data collected revealed that the impact of radical groups had been gradual and had increased over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," commented a researcher. "However, when you encounter this negative framing around immigration every second week, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for instance, by established political organizations, then of course this narrative gains more traction."

Need for Established Groups to Develop Their Distinct Discourses

The research emphasized the need for established parties to develop their distinct discourses, especially on subjects such as immigration and integration, instead of constantly following the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," said one researcher. "When the leader is far-right and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which tune should be playing."